Mostrar registro simples

dc.contributor.authorJulnes, Patria de Lancer
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-02T06:13:02Z
dc.date.available2018-09-02T06:13:02Z
dc.date.issued2009-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://cladista.clad.org//handle/123456789/5979
dc.description.abstractIn this paper I address the notion that performance measurement not only helps improve program managers' ability to make decisions in order to improve effectiveness of government actions, but also helps to support ethics and integrity in governance. First performance measurement systems that focus on outcomes provide an opportunity for communities to engage in dialogue about their value priorities, how to accomplish that which is of value to the community, and how to know if those things that are valued have indeed been accomplished. Second, in addition to transparency, as suggested above, performance measurement can support accountability. It can support control and oversight of government actions in an effort to keep government officials honest and ethical. This I say with caution, however, given that when done for the sole purpose of accountability, external controls such as performance measurement systems may cause more harm than good.
dc.description.abstractWhen it comes to effectiveness, outcome-based performance measurement systems focus attention on the types of program actions that can lead to the desired results. Presumably, policies and programs are implemented because they are believed to contribute to the accomplishment of a particular social goal. Performance measurement systems based on outcomes (results), rather than outputs or inputs, provide useful information that can suggest whether or not we are achieving the desired social good. That is, such systems help determine the extent to which government action is effective.
dc.description.abstractBut there is another side to performance measurement that must be discussed. Adopting and implementing performance measurement systems may elicit unethical behavior. This can occur during the selection and reporting of measures and during the interpretation of performance information. These issues will also be discussed here. In the end, however, I will argue that on the whole, when done properly, performance measurement can do more good than harm in the process of governance.
dc.format.extent19 p.
dc.languageEspañol
dc.publisherUniversity of Baltimore. School of Public Affairs. Doctor of Public Administration Program
dc.rightsCreative Commons BY-SA-NC 4.0 Int
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectCONGRESO CLAD 14-2009
dc.subjectETICA
dc.subjectTRANSPARENCIA
dc.subjectRESPONSABILIDAD PUBLICA
dc.subjectCORRUPCION ADMINISTRATIVA
dc.subjectEFICIENCIA
dc.subjectMEJORAMIENTO DEL RENDIMIENTO
dc.subjectINDICADORES DE DESEMPEÑO
dc.subjectINDICADORES
dc.titleThe role of performance measurement in ethical and effective government
dc.typearticle
clad.congressCongreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública, 14
clad.keyMFN42736--42736
clad.key1KEY42736
clad.md5c1126d5bfa319c8bd72bf658ff90aa7f


Arquivos deste item

Thumbnail

Este item aparece na(s) seguinte(s) coleção(s)

Mostrar registro simples

Creative Commons BY-SA-NC 4.0 Int
Exceto quando indicado o contrário, a licença deste item é descrito como Creative Commons BY-SA-NC 4.0 Int