Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Matthew M.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-02T05:35:44Z
dc.date.available2018-09-02T05:35:44Z
dc.date.issued2005-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://cladista.clad.org//handle/123456789/3553
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares the politics surrounding pension reforms across four Latin American countries, focusing on how institutional differences, particularly in the court system, may influence policy outcomes. But it does so while keeping the policy issue - pension reform - constant, thereby focusing on how similar interest groups acted to pursue their opposition to reform in different ways in different countries, limiting variance across policies. By analyzing the effects of courts on pension reform, I highlight the importance of studying heretofore neglected veto points outside the legislative branch that may play a role in the negotiations over reform in Latin America.
dc.format.extent18 p.
dc.languageInglés
dc.publisherFundação Getulio Vargas
dc.rightsCreative Commons BY-SA-NC 4.0 Int
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectCONGRESO CLAD 10-2005
dc.subjectCOORDINACION
dc.subjectSEGURIDAD SOCIAL
dc.subjectSISTEMAS DE PREVISION SOCIAL
dc.subjectPENSIONES
dc.subjectDESARROLLO INSTITUCIONAL
dc.titleLatin American pension reforms: policymaking and the influence of courts in four differing institutional environments
dc.typearticle
clad.congressCongreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administración Pública, 10
clad.keyMFN37157--37157
clad.key1KEY37157
clad.regionAMERICA LATINA
clad.md50bca1c164cd9afcb88a285c5c13e9a7a


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Creative Commons BY-SA-NC 4.0 Int
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons BY-SA-NC 4.0 Int